Fuel Subsidy Reform in Fragile States: Forging a Constructive IFI-UN Partnership

Even before the COVID-19 pandemic, fragile states around the world struggled to manage complex and interacting risks. Facing macroeconomic stressors on top of a fragile peace, many countries found themselves balancing precariously between tipping points, knowing that interventions that might ease economic tension may push dangerously close to a political precipice, while those designed to alleviate social unrest may drive the country deeper into fiscal crisis. The pandemic has only exacerbated these risks, as governments’ response to COVID-19 further stretches fiscal capacity, while a new scale and depth of hardship magnifies existing grievances or creates new ones.

The IMFC Governors governors during the IMF/World Bank Meetings. (IMF Photograph/Stephen Jaffe)

This policy paper outlines a series of opportunities and challenges for constructive partnership among the IFIs and the UN in fragile states. This paper applies these lessons to the specific issue of fuel subsidy reform, a policy option under consideration to manage mounting fiscal pressure in countries as diverse as Sudan and Lebanon. Relatively low international fuel prices present an opportunity, while at the same time, struggling households and fuel-dependent industries hit hard by the pandemic seek increased government support. With fuel subsidy reforms, success will be measured not only in fiscal savings, but also in the degree to which governments can navigate a tricky political course and minimize welfare loss, particularly for the poor. The World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, and UN can each support aspects of the reform agenda, but to ensure success of the whole, coordination among the three in their interactions with government will be essential.

Read the full policy paper: Fuel Subsidy Reform in Fragile States: Forging a Constructive IFI-UN Partnership

This paper was produced as a collaboration between New York University’s Center on International Cooperation (CIC) and the Center for Global Development (CGD).  

More Resources

  • Publication: Policy Brief October 15, 2020 Promoting and Defending Multilateralism

    A Stocktaking of the UN-IFI Relationship on Prevention and Peacebuilding, 2018 to 2020

    In 2018, the United Nations (UN) and the World Bank published a groundbreaking report driven by the conviction that the international community’s attention must urgently be rebalanced from crisis response to prevention. Pathways for Peace offered a joint framework for conflict prevention, and as it has gathered momentum, other international financial institutions (IFIs)—such as the International Monetary Fund (IMF)— have re-examined their approach to fragile and conflict-affected countries. The first part of the stocktaking will focus on the UN-World Bank relationship, followed by a brief overview of partnership with the IMF.

  • Publication: Report September 23, 2021 Inequality & Exclusion

    From Regressive Subsidies to Progressive Redistribution: The Role of Redistribution and Recognition in Energy Subsidy Reform

    Energy subsidies are one of the few domains where there is a near full-throated consensus among progressives, governments, and economists over the need for reform. In this paper, we argue that the Pathfinders' "Recognition and Redistribution" framework provides some important clues about better ways to manage energy subsidy reform while avoiding or minimizing the risk of anti-government protests.

Stay Connected

Join our mailing list to receive regular updates on our latest events, analysis, and resources.