An Ambiguous Election: Tshisekedi’s First 100 Days in Office

Publication: Report

More and more despair has been gnawing at the hearts of Congolese men and women. Recent political events have not fulfilled our people's dreams.

Archbishop of Kinshasa, Mgr Fridolin Ambongo April 21, 2019 Democratic Rebulic of Congo

The Democratic Republic of the Congo held national presidential and legislative elections on December 30th 2018. The elections, which had been delayed by two years, were mired in controversy. The national electoral commission declared opposition leader Felix Tshisekedi the winner of the presidential poll. However, a leak from the same commission, whose results were extremely similar to those released by the Catholic Church’s observation mission, showed that Martin Fayulu, another opposition leader, clearly won the elections.

Despite this controversy, the post-electoral scene has been relatively stable. Tshisekedi was inaugurated on January 24th and has spent his first months traveling abroad––meeting with at least 17 heads of state since January––and in the country. Meanwhile, Martin Fayulu has launched a campaign to contest the election results, holding rallies in several towns across the country.

How do Congolese feel about these events? In order to assess public opinion at this critical juncture, the Congo Research Group (CRG) at New York University (NYU) and the Bureau d’Études, de Recherches, et Consulting International (BERCI) conducted two nationally representative telephone polls in March (1,212 people) and May 2019 (1,294 people). The poll supports the following conclusions:

Congolese have mixed feelings about the elections:

  • Nearly half think the elections were rigged, but still accept the results;
  • A majority of respondents (56%) do not trust the electoral commission, yet 62% are satisfied with the way democracy works in the country.
  • 67% have a positive opinion of Félix Tshisekedi’s performance as president, a significantly higher approval than that for last two Congolese presidents after their first 100 days in office, Joseph Kabila (44%) in March 2001 and Laurent-Désiré Kabila (51%) in August 1997.
  • For the first time in many years, respondents feel optimistic about the direction the country is headed (61%) in May 2019, an increase of 34% over November 2017.
  • A clear majority Congolese (58%) disapproves of the current alliance between Tshisekedi’s coalition and that of the former President Joseph Kabila.
  • Unlike in December 2018, Martin Fayulu is no longer the most popular Congolese politician, but in May 48% were in favor of him leading the opposition, twice as many as for other opposition leaders Moise Katumbi or Jean-Pierre Bemba.
  • The top 3 priorities for the newly elected president are related to improving living conditions and other economic issues”; “peace and security reform,” including including launching legal proceeding against Kabila and his ministers”; and “the repair or construction of infrastructure.”
  • Although most respondents (57%) get their news from local media, international media are considered as being more neutral for the majority of the respondents (70% vs 53%).

Download the entire polling report BERCI/CRG Poll: An Ambiguous Election.pdf

More Resources

  • Publication: Analysis May 17, 2023 CIC Perspectives

    Managing Opportunities, Challenges, and Expectations for the New Agenda for Peace

    Ahead of the policy brief expected from the UN Secretariat in June 2023, this piece provides a historical glance at past UN reforms, identifies the primary challenges and opportunities the UN and its member states face as they undergo this process, and looks forward to the key priorities that can be taken up from a realistic and practical perspective. Highlighted is how the New Agenda for Peace “provides a rare opportunity for the United Nations to examine and reflect upon the totality of the peace and security work of the Organization to uncover and better understand the synergies and contradictions of the existing processes and structures.”

  • Publication: Policy Brief April 24, 2023

    Does the Present Interpretation of the UN Principles Cause Harm in Syria and Yemen?

    This policy brief takes a comparative examination of how the United Nations has adopted a paradoxical interpretation of its guiding principles to address the complex humanitarian crises in Syria and Yemen. It offers approaches that could change the course of international humanitarian operations and protect them from further politicization, weaponization, and diversion.

Stay Connected

Join our mailing list to receive regular updates on our latest events, analysis, and resources.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.