The global pandemic has laid bare the digital inequities across vertical (income) and horizontal (social, political, and identity) dimensions, while exposing the extent to which pre-pandemic approaches to bridging the digital divide have been dominated by economic considerations even while they are not universally treated as policy priorities. "Digital Inclusion in the Peruvian Amazon" by Jack Gordon for USAID / Digital Development Communications, retrieved from https://www.flickr.com/photos/121302193@N07/48138815722/, (CC BY-NC 2.0)
Access to digital is a product of both material investment and political will. Where there is no conscious effort to include marginalized communities into digitalization plans, these communities can be left behind. In countries where identity-based exclusion is routinely built into political behavior, there can be systematic patterns of exclusion of specific groups (e.g., the indigenous First Peoples of North America, the Roma of Europe, or the Somali of northeast Kenya). Many countries around the world have such communities, and any work to digitalize a country must be founded on politically and socially conscious efforts to include groups that may be left behind by historical marginalization.
This brief reviews key aspects of the digital divide, with special attention to exclusion and inequality, emphasizing that poor connectivity isn’t just about wealth—it is also about inequality. This paper examines the following:
That COVID-19 has shown how poor policymaking in digital access and use deepens the current inequalities in addition to creating new ones,
Digital equity through recent thinking, research—and why it matters, and
Experience with digital equity initiatives (pre- and post-pandemic).
Finally, the authors provide key recommendations for potential digital policies and interventions that can advance equality and inclusion.
This piece outlines the process for electing five new judges to the International Court of Justice (ICJ), which is forthcoming next month (November 2026) at the United Nations (UN). The ICJ was established as a principal organ of the UN when the UN was established in 1945, and its statute was adopted when the UN Charter was adopted.
Foreign Policy in Focus uses analysis from Thibault Camelli and Ronny Patz's policy brief, How to End the United Nations’ Current Financial Crisis… and Prevent Future Ones, published earlier this year to inform this piece on the United Nations' current financial state.
Source:Foreign Policy in Focus, October 6, 2026
Stay Connected
Subscribe to our newsletter and receive regular updates on our latest events, analysis, and resources.